Á¦      ¸ñ: ºñ±³ Á¾±³ ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý·Ð ¾È¸íÁØ
ÀÌ      ¸§: ¾È¸íÁØ
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏÀÚ: 2008.04.07 - 14:27


Á¾±³ ¿¬±¸ ¹æ¹ý·Ð(ºñ±³Á¾±³ÇÐ °­ÀÇ Áß¿¡¼­)

¾È¸íÁر³¼ö



ºñ±³ Á¾±³¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÐÀÚµéÀÇ Á¤ÀÇ-

    The term comparative religion, a shortened form of "the comparative study of     religion (or religions)," became current in the late nineteenth century as a         synonym for "the science of religion" (in German, Religionswissenschaft; in     French, la science de religion). As originally conceived, it centered on the         application of the comparative (or scientific) method to the data provided by     the relgions of the world, past and present.- Eric J. Sharpe

    two schools-

    1. Mark Muller- the philological school. äÇʱÙ, 199-201

    Max Muller- Religionswissenschaft analyzes historical forms of religion,.
    Jame Freeman Clarke- concentrated on the history of religious doctrines in         different traditions.
        1873³â <Á¾±³ÇÐ ¼­·Ð>¿¡¼­ ¾ð¾î¿Í Á¾±³´Â ¼­·Î ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÑ °ü°è°¡ ÀÖ´Ù´Â         µ¥¼­ Ãâ¹ß. ½ÅÀ» Àεµ¿¡¼­´Â µ¥¹Ù. À̶õ-µ¥¿Í, ±×¸®½º-Á¦¿ì½º, ·Î¸¶-ÁêÇÇ        ´õ. ¿©±â¼­ °°Àº ¾î±Ù¿¡¼­ ¹ß´ÞÇÔÀ» ¾Ë ¼öÀÖ´Ù. ¹®¹ýÀû ¿¹¸¦ ¿­°ÅÇÑ´Ù.
    Eliade-Religionswissenschaft- history of religion, the comparative study of         religions and religious morphology(¾îÇü·Ð) and phenomenology.
    
    2. Adolf Bastian- the anthropological school, Theodor Waits, E. B. Tylor,             James     G. Frazer, Andrew Lang. ÁøÈ­·ÐÀûÀÎ Á¢±Ù ¹æ¹ý. ŸÀÏ·¯-Á¤³ç¼þ        ¹è-¿µÀû    Á¸Àç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Å¾Ó

        

4. ºñ±³Á¾±³ÇÐ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¿ª»ç

    Ä®ºóÁÖÀÇ ±³¸®(±¸¼Ó¹ÞÁö ¸øÇÑÀÚÀÇ ÀüÀûÀΠŸ¶ô)´Â À̹æÁ¾±³¿¡ ´ëÇÑ µ¿Á¤ÀûÀÎ °ß    ÇØ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹Ýµ¿À̾ú´Ù.. E. O. James, Comparative Religion, p. 15.

    Joseph Scaliger- treated OT as an intergral part of ancient history.
    John Selden- showed some critical understanding of Semitic mythology.
    Cudworth argued that Plato's trinity was derived from Hebraism.
    Dr. John Spencer- the ritual laws of the Hebrews which Robertson Smith         somewhat optimistically described as laying 'the foundations of the science of     comparative religion'.

    ÁøÈ­·ÐÀûÀÎ °³³ä

    Comte had laid the foundations of the Comparative Method in the study of         social and religious institutions.
    Darwinism

The Comparative Method

    Sir Edward Tylor in 1865, Researches into the Ealry History of Mankind, the     first systematic attempt to explain the similarity in beliefs, customes and         culture, (½Å¾Ó, ½À°ü, ¹®È­¿¡ ÀÖ´Â À¯»ç¼ºÀ» ÃÖÃÊ·Î Á¶Á÷Àû ½Ãµµ¸¦ ÇÔ) E. O.         James, Comparative Religion, p.21- .

The Historical Method    

    M. Muller- Á¾±³ÀÇ ±â¿øÀ» ¹ß°ßÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ½ÅµéÀÇ À̸§À» ¾î¿øÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ½ÅÈ­¾È¿¡ ÀÖ´Â ºñÀ̼ºÀû ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ ¾î¿øÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ¼³¸íÇÏ·Á´Â ½Ãµµ. (Ibid
 24). Religion arose through the personification of natural phenomena.

    º¹À½Àû ½ÅÇÐÀÚ-
    Sir Norman Anderson, Lesslie Newbigin, Walter Martin, John H.             Gerstner, Dean C. Halverson, Vroom, Piet Meiring, Crafford.

5. ºñ±³ Á¾±³ÇÐÀÇ ¿¬±¸ ¹æ¹ý·Ð

     ¼¼°èÀÇ ¿©·¯ Á¾±³¿Í ¶Ç´Â Àΰ£»ýÈ°¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³­ ¿©·¯°¡Áö Á¾±³ÇüŸ¦ ºñ±³¿¬±¸ÇÔ.

°´°üÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÀüÁ¦

    Á¾±³ ´Üü¿¡ °ü´ëÇÑ ¸¶À½,
    ÀڷḦ Á¤Á÷ÇÏ°Ô ºÐ¼®
    ½ÅÁßÇÑ °üÂû
    °ü·ÃµÈ ¾ð¾îÀ» ÀÌÇØ

¼³¸í- ÇÕ¹ýÀûÀ¸·Î Á¦ÇÑµÈ »óȲ¾È¿¡¼­ Àΰú°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿©ÁÖ´Â °Í, ´©°¡, ¹«¾ùÀ», ¾ðÁ¦, ¾îµð    ¼­, ¿Ö.

¼­¼ú°ú ÀÌ·Ð- ¿ª»çÀûÀÎ »ç½Ç ¼³¸í( °æÇèÀ̳ª ¿ª»çÀûÀÎ ÀÚ·á¿¡¼­ ºñ·ÔµÈ ´ë´äÀº ¼­¼úÀûÀÎ     ¼³¸í ¶Ç´Â °üÂûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Á¤µµ¿Í ´ëÁß¿¡°Ô ÇÑÁ¤µÈ ÀÚ·á¿¡ ±â¹ÝÀ» µÐ ¼³¸í)°ú ÇР   ¹®¿¡ ±â¹ÝÀ» µÐ ´ë´ä.


Á¾±³ÇÐÀÇ ¿¬±¸ ¹æ¹ý·Ð- 1. Lewis and Travis, Religious Traditions of the             World,     pp. 37-66

    1) °³¼ºÁÖÀÇÀÚµéÀÇ Á¢±Ù¹æ½Ä    

    The Personalist Approach: What do the followers of this religion or         religious community believe to be true?- W. C. Smith
    ÀÌ·ÐÀ̳ª ÃÊ¿ª»çÀûÀÎ Â÷¿øÀ» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â ¼­¼úÀûÀÎ ¹æ½Ä, ÀÌ ¹æ½ÄÀº ¾î¶²     ½Å¾ÓÀ̳ª ÀǽÄÀÌ ±×°ÍÀ» ¹Þ¾ÆµéÀÌ´Â »ç¶÷À̳ª ´Üü¿¡°Ô ¾î¶°ÇÑ Àǹ̰¡ Àִ    °¡¸¦ ¾Ë°íÀÚ ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ý. ÀÌ°ÍÀº ±× Á¾±³ÀÇ ÃßÁ¾ÀÚ°¡ ¹«¾ùÀÌ Áø¸®À̸ç Áß¿äÇÑ °Í    À̶ó°í ÀÎÁ¤ÇÏ´ÂÁö¸¦ ÀÌÇØÇÏ°íÀÚÇÑ´Ù. (35)

ÀüÁ¦Á¶°Ç- ·çÀ̽º, 37-38

    1. Á߽ɰ³³ä°ú ½ÅÁ¶¹× °ü½À¸¦ °³Àκ°, ´Üü·Î ÀÌÇØ
    2. ¿¹¹èÀÇ½Ä ¹× ±³¸®´Â ±× Á¾±³¾È¿¡¼­ ÀÌÇØ
    3. °¢°¢ÀÇ Á¾±³¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇØ´Â ±× ½Å¾ÓÀÇ ÇÐÀÚ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °ËÁõ

ÈùµÎ±³ÀÇ ¿ìÆijª¾ß³ª ÀǽÄÀ» ½º¹Ì½º ÀÌ·Ð Àû¿ë- 38-43
    ÀÌ ÀǽÄÀº ÈùµÎ ¼Ò³âµéÀ» Á¤°áÇÏ°Ô ¸¸µé¾î  ÈùµÎ Àå³âÀÇ À§Ä¡¿¡ ¼­µµ·Ï ÇÏ´Â µ¥     ¸ñÀûÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ÀǽÄÀÌ´Ù.

    ÀǽÄÀ» ÇϳªÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ À§ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÀÌÇØÇÑ´Ù.
    Á¤°áÇÏ°Ô Áغñ,
    ÀÇ½Ä ¹¦»ç- ÁøÁöÇÏ°Ô ÀǽÄÀ» ÁøÇà
    Çлý(ºê¶óÈ帶ī¸°)ÀÌ µÎ ¹ø ž °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ°ÍÀÌ ÂüµÈ ÈùµÎ ³²ÀÚ·Î µÈ´Ù°í ÇÑ    ´Ù. Ä«½ºÆ®°è±ÞÀÇ ¿ÏÀüÇÑ ÀÚ°ÝÀÚ°¡ µÇ°í, º£´Ù °æÀüÀ» °øºÎÇÑ´Ù.

°¢°¢ÀÇ ÀÔÀå
    ¾ÆÄ«¶ó(¼±»ý)- ±×ÀÇ ¿¹Àü¿¡ °¡Á³´ø °¨Á¤°ú Àǹ®Á¡À» ½ÇÁ¸ÀûÀ¸·Î Àç°æÇèÀÇ °è±â
    ºÎ¸ðÀÇ ÀÔÀå- ÀÚ¶û½º·± ¾ÆµéÀÌ ÈùµÎÀÎÀÌ µÊ, ´ú ÀÇÁ¸ÀûÀÎ °Í¿¡ ¼­±ÛÆÛ Áø´Ù.
    ¼Ò³âÀÇ ÀÔÀå-ÈïºÐ°ú ¾ö¼÷ÇÔ, ±âµµ- ¼Ò³âÀÇ ³»¸éÀûÀÎ ¼º°Ý, °¨ÃçÁø ¿äÀο¡ ±âÀÎ.      ÈùµÎÀÎÀ¸·Î Áß¿äÇÑ °æÇè

°á±¹, °³¼ºÁÖÀÇ ¹æ½ÄÀº °³ÀεéÀÌ ÀÌÇØÇÏ°í °æÇèÇÏ´Â ¿ìÆijª¾ß³ª ÀǽĿ¡ ÁÖ·Î °ü½ÉÀ» ½ñ    ´Â ¹Ý¸é, ¾î¶»°Ô °¢ »ç¶÷ÀÌ ÀÌ ¼¼´ë¿¡¼­ Àú ¼¼´ë·Î ÀüÇØÁ® ³»·Á¿À´Â ÀüÅë¿¡ Âü¿©    ÇÏ°í ±×°ÍÀ» ¼öÁ¤Çϴ°¡ ÇÏ´Â ¹®Á¦¿¡ °ü½É.    


2) ±¸Á¶ÁÖÀÇ. The Structuralism of Hans Penner: What hidden structure is                 understood by the structuralist?

    ÀÌ ¹æ¹ýÀº ÇൿÀÌ ÀǹÌÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?
    Á¾±³ÀÇ ¾ð¾î°¡ ÀǹÌÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?
    
    ¿¬±¸°úÁ¦´Â

    1. ´Ù¸éÀûÀÎ ½ÅÁ¶µé°ú °ü½ÀÀ» ÀÌÇØÇÏ·ÁÇÔ(°æÀü¿¡¼­ °üÂûÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ ½ÇÁ¦ ¿ª»çÀû     »ç½ÇÀ» ¿¬±¸ÇÏ·ÁÇÔ)
    2. ½ÅÁ¶¿Í °ü½ÀÀ» ã±â À§ÇØ, °ø½ÄÀûÀÎ ±ÔÄ¢À» ã±â À§ÇÑ ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸
    3. ½ÉÃæ ±¸Á¶ -
    4. ½ÉÃþ ±¸Á¶À» (±× Áý´ÜÀÌ °®´Â ¹«ÀǽÄÀûÀÎ ¼ÒÀ¯¹°) ¿¬±¸ ÀÌÇØÇÑ´Ù.

¿ìÆijª¾ß³ª ÀǽĿ¡ Àû¿ëÇØ º»´Ù¸é

    1. »îÀÇ µÎ ´ëÁ¶ÀûÀÎ ´Ü°è.
    ÀǽÄÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© Âü¿©ÀÚÀÇ »óÅ¿¡ º¯È­¸¦ ¾î¶»°Ô ¼ºÃëÇϴ°¡¸¦ Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ¼³¸íÇÏ´Â     ½Ãµµ.  
    2. Âü¿©ÀÚÀÇ ¿òÁ÷ÀÓ°ú ¹æÇâÀ» °­Á¶- ÇØ´çÇÏ´Â »ó¡ÀÇ ÀÇ¹Ì °­Á¶.
    µ¿Àº ½Åµé, ³·, âÁ¶¸¦ »ó¡ÇÑ´Ù.
    ¼­´Â ±Í½Å, ¹ã, Æı«¸¦ ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù.
     ³²Àº Á¶»ó, ÇØÁú ¹«·Æ, ÁïÀ½À» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù.
    ºÏÀº »ç¶÷, »õº®, ÀλýÀ» °¡¸£Å²´Ù.
    3. ½ÉÃ汸Á¶- °Åµì³ªÁö ¾ÊÀº »óÅ¿¡¼­ -±Í½Å¿¡ ¼ÓÇÔ- ½Åµé°ú µ¿ÀÏÇÑ »óÅ º¯È­.

½º¹Ì½º¿Í Æä³Ê ºñ±³

    Â÷ÀÌÁ¡- ÀǽĿ¡¼­ÀÇ ¹æÇâ°ú ¾ð¾î¿¡ °ü½É(Æä³Ê), °³ÀÎÀÇ ÀǽÄÀûÀÎ °æÇèÇÏ°í Ç¥Çö    Çϰųª, ÀÌÇØÇÏ°í ÀÎÁ¤. ÀǽÄÀÇ Àǹ̸¦ ±¸ÇÔ(½º¹Ì½º).
    
    °øÅëÁ¡-ÃÊ¿ª»çÀûÀÎ ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ ÀÎÁ¤¾Ê°í, ¹¦»çÀûÀÎ ¼º°Ý.            
        

3). ±â´ÉÁÖÀÇ    The Functionalism of Emile Durkheim: What role does religion play in             the  life of society as a whole?
                    
    Á¾±³°¡ »çȸ¿Í °³ÀεéÀÇ »î ¼Ó¿¡¼­ ¾î¶»°Ô ¿ªÇÒÀ» Çϴ°¡?
    ±â´ÉÁÖÀÇ´Â ±× ÀÚü¿¡ ºñ¿ª»çÀûÀÎ °³³äÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ´Ù.
    »çȸ¶õ ±× »çȸÀÇ ±¸¼º ¿ä¼Òµé·Î ÁÙÀÌÁú ¼ö ¾ø´Â Àüü¶ó°í ¸»ÇÔ
    ÃÊ¿ª»çÀûÀÎ ½Å»ý Áý´ÜÀÌ °³ÀεéÀÇ ÇൿÀ» ¾ï¾Ð.

Á¾±³ Àǽĵé°ú ½ÅµµµéÀÌ ³¢Ä¡´Â »çȸÀûÀÎ °á°ú

    1. ±Ý¿åÁÖÀÇÀû °ü½ÀÀÌ »çȸÀûÀÎ Á¶È­, ´Ü°á, Á¸Àç¿¡ ÇʼöÀû.
    2. °³°³ÀÎ °á¼ÓÇÏ´Â ±â´É
    3. »çȸÀûÀÎ °¡Ä¡¿Í ÀüÅëµî, ±× À¯»êÀ» Àü¼ö
    4. À§·ÎÀÇ ±â´É-»çȸ ´õ¿í °­È­

¿ìÆijª¾ß³ª ÀǽÄÀ» Àû¿ë

    1. Ä«½ºÆ® °è±ÞÀÇ Àǹ«¿Í »çȸ¿¡ µû¸£°Ô ÇÑ´Ù.
    Àεµ»ç¶÷µéÀÌ ÀÌ Á¦µµ¿¡ ÀÇÇؼ­ ¼÷¸íÀûÀ¸·Î ¼øÁ¾ÇÏ´Â Á¤´çÀ» ºÎ¿©ÇÏ°Ô ÇÑ´Ù.
    2. ÀǽĿ¡ Âü¿©ÇÑ Áý´ÜÀÇ »ç±³ÀûÀÎ ¸¸³²À» ÅëÇÏ¿© ÅëÀϼº°ú µ¿Áú¼º Çü¼º.
    3. °ú°ÅÀÇ ÀüÅëÀ» Àü´ÞÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±× »çȸÀÇ Áö¼Ó¼ºÀ» È®°íÇÏ°Ô ÇÑ´Ù.

°á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î ±â´ÉÁÖÀÇ´Â ¾î¶»°Ô Á¾±³°¡ °³ÀÎ ÁÖÀǸ¦ ±³Á¤ÇÏ°í, °³°³ÀεéÀ» »çȸ ´ÜÀ§µé·Î    ¹­À¸¸ç, °³Àε鿡°Ô µ¿Áú¼º°ú °á¼Ó·Â¸¦ °¡Á®´Ù ÁÖ´Â ÀüÅëÀ» º¸ÀüÇÏ°í Àü´ÞÇϴ°¡     ÇÏ´Â µîÀÇ »çȸ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °¡Ä¡·Î¼­, Á¾±³¸¦ ¼³¸íÇÑ´Ù. (50).
    Âü°í·Î,
    ÀεµÀÇ °æ¿ì ÈùµÎ±³¿Í Ä«½ºÆ®Á¦µµ´Â ÇÊ¿¬ÀûÀÎ °ü°è¸¦ °®°í ÀÖ´Ù.

4) Ç¥ÁØ ¹æ½Ä (The Normative Approach of Hendrik Kraemer:
    Are the beliefs of this religon true?)

    Á¾±³ÀûÀÎ ½ÅÁ¶¿Í °ü½À¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­ ÀÌ  Á¾±³´Â Áø½ÇÇÑ°¡? Ç¥ÁØ ¹æ½ÄÀº ¾î¶² ÀÎÁ¤¹Þ    ´Â ±âÁØÀ¸·Î Á¾±³°¡ ÁÖÀåÇÏ´Â Áø½ÇÀÇ ¿Ç°í ±×¸§À» Æò°¡ÇÑ´Ù. ¼­¼úÀûÀÎ ¹æ½Ä.

    ÀüÁ¦Á¶°Ç

    1. Çö½Ç ¼¼°è¿¡¼­ ¸ðµÎ°¡ µ¿ÀÇÇÏ´Â °³³äÀ¸·Î¼­ Á¾±³¶ó´Â °ÍÀº ¾ø´Ù. ´Ù¸¸ Çö½Ç¿¡    ¼­ Á¾±³¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© »óÀÀÇÏ´Â °³³ä°ú º»Áú¸¸ ¹ß°ßÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù°í ÇÑ´Ù.
    2. Á¾±³µéÀº ÀÖ´Ù. °³ÀÎÀÇ Á¾±³¼º ÀÎÁ¤ÇÑ´Ù.
    3. Á¾±³´Â ¼þ°íÇÑ °Í, ¹Ì·ÃÇÑ °Í, Áø½Ç°ú °ÅÁþ, »î°ú Á×À½ÀÌ ÇÔ²²ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
    4. ¿¹¼ö ±×¸®½ºµµ´Â  ÃÊ¿ùÇÑ Çϳª´ÔÀÇ ½ÇÁ¦ °è½Ã´Ù. À¯Àϼº °­Á¶. ¼Í°æÀûÀÎ »ç½Ç    ÁÖÀÇ.

ÀÚ±âµé¸¸ÀÌ °úÇÐÀûÀÌ°í °´°üÀûÀ̶ó°í ÁÖÀåÇÏ´Â Á¾±³ÇÐÆÄÀÇ ¿À·ù¸¦ ÁöÀûÇÏ°í Á¾±³ ¿¬±¸ ¹æ½ÄÀº Çؼ®ÀûÀÌ°í ÁÖ°üÀûÀ̶ó°í ¼ÖÁ÷È÷ ½ÃÀÎÇÏ°í, ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀÇ Ãâ¹ßÁ¡À¸·Î ½ÅÇÐÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ Ãâ¹ßÁ¡ÀÌ °è½ÃÀÌ´Ù. ±×¸®½ºµµ¸¦ ¸»ÇÑ´Ù. ÀÚ¿¬°è½Ã·Î¼­(Ÿ¶ôÀÌÈÄ) ¼¼°èÁ¾±³´Â Çϳª´Ô²² Èñ¹ÌÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀÀÌ´Ù. ÁßÀçÀڷμ­ ¿ÀÁ÷ ¿¹¼ö¸¦ ¸»ÇÑ´Ù.
    
5). ·Î¹öÆ® º£¾îµåÀÇ Á¾±³¿¬±¸»ç(History of Religons Approach of Robert Baird: Does     the object and     method of religious study rest on historical grounds?)

    ¿ª»çÀûÀÎ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ Á¾±³¸¦ ¿¬±¸ÇÑ´Ù. ¸ñÀû°ú ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ¸ðµÎ ¿ª»çÀûÀÎ °í·Á »çÇ×ÀÌ    ´Ù. Àηù¿Í ±×µéÀÇ Á¾±³¸¦ Ãë±ÞÇÏ´Â °ú°ÅÀÇ ¸ðµç °Í¿¡ °ü½ÉÀ» °¡Áø´Ù.    
                
¿ìÆĴϾ߳ª ÀÇ½Ä Àû¿ë

    »çȸÀû, ½Ã´ëÀû ¹è°æ ¼Ó¿¡¼­ °üÂûÇÑ´Ù. ¿ª»çÀÇ º¯Ãµ¼Ó¿¡¼­ ÀǽÄÀÌ ¾î¶»°Ô º¯È­Çß    °í Âü°¡ÀÚµéÀÇ ÀÌ ±× ÀǽÄÀÇ Á߿伺°ú Àǹ̿¡ °üÇØ ¿¬±¸ÇÑ´Ù.
                    

6) °³ÇõÁÖÀÇÀû ¹æ¹ý
    
    °³ÇõÁÖÀÇÀûÀÎ ½ÅÇÐÀÇ Æ²¾È¿¡¼­ Ÿ Á¾±³¸¦ ¿¬±¸ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ¾ÆÁ÷±îÁö ȹ±âÀûÀÎ     ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ¹ßÇ¥µÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÁö¸¸ ¸î°¡Áö¸¦ Á¦¾ÈÇÑ´Ù.
    
    1. ÀÚ¿¬ °è½Ã¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºÐ¸íÇÑ ¿¬±¸¿Í ´õºÒ¾î¼­ ŸÁ¾±³µéÀ» ¿¬±¸ÇÏ°í ±× °á°úµéÀ»     ±âµ¶±³¿Í ºñ±³ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
    2. ÀÚ¿¬ °è½Ã´Â °ú¿¬ Çϳª´Ô²² À̸£´Â Á¢ÃËÁ¡ÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´ÂÁö¸¦ °ËÅäÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.
    ÇÐÀڵ鰣¿¡ ¸¹Àº ÀÇ°ßÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. Á¾±³ ´Ù¿øÁÖÀÇÀÚµéÀº ´ç¿¬È÷ Ÿ Á¾±³ÀÇ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î     ±¸¿ø¿¡ À̸¥´Ù°í ÁÖÀåÇÑ´Ù. À̵éÀÇ ¹®Á¦Á¡À» ºÐ¸íÈ÷ ¾Ë¾Æ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.
    3. À¯ÀÏÇÑ ±¸¿øÀ¸·Î ±×¸®½ºµµ¸¦ ÀÎÁ¤ÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.
    4. Çϳª´ÔÀÇ À¯ÀÏÇÑ °è½Ã·Î¼­ ¼º°æÀ» ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î µÎ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ¼º°æÀÇ ÇÏ    ³ª´Ô¸¸ÀÌ Âü´Ù¿î ½ÅÀÓÀ» ¸í½ÉÇ϶ó.
    ¼º°æÀº Çϳª´ÔÀº Á¸ÀçÇϽŴٶó°í ¸»ÇÑ´Ù. ´Ù¸¥ ½ÅÀ» ¾ø´Ù°í ¸»ÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ°ÍÀÌ Ç¥ÁØ    ÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ°ÍÀº ¼º°æÀÚüÀÇ ±ÇÀ§¿¡¼­ ³ª¿Â°Í. Àΰ£ÀÇ ±ÇÀ§°¡ ¾Æ´Ï´Ù. ¼º°æÀ» ±â·ÏÇÏ    °ÔÇÑ Çϳª´ÔÀÇ ±ÇÀ§¸¦ ÀÎÁ¤Çϴ°ÍÀÌ´Ù.
    5. ŸÁ¾±³ÀÇ °æÀüÀ» Á¾±³ÇÐÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î  ¿¬±¸ÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.
    6. ŸÁ¾±³ÀÇ ¹®È­¸¦ ¿Ã¹Ù¸£°Ô ÀÌÇØÇÒ °Í
    7. ±âµ¶±³ÀÇ ¹®È­¿Í ¿ª»ç°üÀ» °¡Áö°í ŸÁ¾±³¸¦ ¿¬±¸ÇÒ °Í