À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
<!--TITLE_DATA-->
 
::: Çؼ®ÇÐ :::


96 22 Åë°èÄ«¿îÅÍ º¸±â   °ü¸®ÀÚ Á¢¼Ó --+
Name   °ü¸®ÀÚ
Subject   Aristotle on theology
God and Theology


So far, we have seen God pop up as an unmoved mover who changes and moves determinate beings through being the object of the soul¡¯s desire (and so both the sustainer and ground of final causation, and thereby the initiator of efficient causation).

But what kind of being would God have to be? The four aspects of soul (Nutritive, Sensitive, Motive, Intellective) are found together in humans, and higher aspects always include the lower. But could intellective soul exist by itself? Aristotle says "yes" though this is not unproblematic. As pure intellective soul, God must be eternal (as you might expect an unmoved mover to be), and this makes God an exception to the rule that all actual beings are hylomorphic: a mixture of matter, form (and a principle of unity).

Granted that the idea of God is an exception to Aristotle¡¯s metaphysical system in this one respect, what would the properties of God be? God would be eternal, pure form, pure structure, perfect, changeless, and so pure actuality and no potentiality. God¡¯s activity would consist in beholding the divine self, which is the only perfect object.

Remember Aristotle¡¯s reasons for thinking there is a God answering to this description:

efficient causes don¡¯t go all the way down, so motion implies there must be an unmoved first mover; and
everything has a natural state toward which it tends, and the entire universe ultimately tends toward God; God is the ultimate final cause.
Note that the question about the contingency of the whole universe is not being asked here; motion and the order of nature is being explained. Though Aristotle is not asking the question about the ontological dependence of the universe, he is setting up this question for later thinkers. The theological "next step" would look something like this:

If everything has a purpose, then the world has a purpose. Aristotle thought that the world was eternal and God a component of what was, approximately, a vast organism. Christian thinkers, however, were willing to think of purposes on the analogy of human purposes: the world¡¯s purpose requires someone to "have it," even as human purposes are the possession of human minds. The world, therefore, is the purpose of God, and was created.

This step was taken in middle Platonism, and in Platonic rather than Aristotelian terminology. The key figure is Philo, a Jewish thinker, who regarded Plato's forms as the ideas of God in creating the world. Later, Christian theologians will intensify this vision of creation by insisting that God created not by forming matter but from nothing (ex nihilo). The first theologians to advance this idea appear to have been Tatian (famous for the Diatesseron, a harmonization of the gospels) and Theophilus (Bishop of Antioch), in the late second century CE.









----------------------------------
Theological Significance


The influence of Aristotle on theology is immense, especially in the middle ages, but also (and more anonymously) in the period of the formation of the key Christian doctrines. In fact, Aristotle was arguably the philosopher who was to exercise the greatest influence on Christian theology (recall that this same statement was made with reference to Plato). Aristotle's influence on theology can be summarized in fairly colorless fashion as follows:

God: Introduces the main themes of a profoundly influential idea of God

Creation: Paves the way for asking the question about creatio ex nihilo

Metaphysics: Furnishes philosophy with many of the distinctions that theologians will later use to discuss such basic issues as Christology and Trinity.

Ethics: Here the influence was very mixed.

Positively: introduces ideas of Natural Law and Golden Mean
Negatively: provides first great rationalization of patriarchy and slavery
Society: Chain of Being provides a new way of understanding church and society in the middle ages (everything has "natural" position in social hierarchy)

Medieval Scholastic Theology: Furnishes many of the distinctions, problems, and tools for medieval scholastic theology, including proofs for the existence of God, theory of the Eucharist, ecclesiology, social policy, natural law, etc.

°Ô½Ã¹°À» À̸ÞÀÏ·Î º¸³»±â ÇÁ¸°Æ®Ãâ·ÂÀ» À§ÇÑ È­¸éº¸±â
DATE: 2012.03.11 - 22:49
LAST UPDATE: 2012.03.11 - 22:51

119.194.117.175 - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.30618; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)


 ÀÌÀü±Û Plato and Christianity
 ´ÙÀ½±Û Hermeneutics From Wikipedia, the free encyclope...
±Û³²±â±â»èÁ¦Çϱâ¼öÁ¤Çϱâ´äº¯´Þ±âÀüü ¸ñ·Ï º¸±â

üũµÈ Ç׸ñ ÇѲ¨¹ø¿¡ º¸±â
46Simple view¾Æ¸®½ºÅäÅÚ·¹½º °ü¸®ÀÚ 2012.03.19 1993
45Simple view½ºÅä¾Æ ÇÐÆÄ /À§Å°ÇǾƠ°ü¸®ÀÚ 2012.03.16 1586
44philosamuel.hml [49 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewÇÊ·ÎÀÇÇؼ®ÇРõ »ç¹«¿¤ °ü¸®ÀÚ 2012.03.16 2688
43Simple viewöÇÐÀÚ »çÀü-³×À̹ö ¾È¸íÁØ 2012.03.12 2006
42Çؼ®À»À§ÇÑ Ã¶ÇÐÀÌÇØ(Ph[1].D).hwp [42 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view½ÅÇаú Çؼ®°­ÀÇ -  Ã¶Çаú ½ÅÇР¾È¸íÁØ 2012.03.12 1710
41Simple viewÇؼ®Çаú öÇлçÀÌÆ® °ü¸®ÀÚ 2012.03.11 1708
40Simple viewPlato and Christianity °ü¸®ÀÚ 2012.03.11 1445
39ÇöÀç Àаí ÀÖ´Â ±ÛÀÔ´Ï´Ù.Aristotle on theology  °ü¸®ÀÚ 2012.03.11 1608
38Simple viewHermeneutics From Wikipedia, the free encyclope... ¾È¸íÁØ 2012.03.04 1995
372012-02-15 16.21.49.jpg [2.7 MB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewÇؼ®ÇÐ Âü°í¹®Çå 2 ¾È 2012.02.16 1542
362012-02-15 16.22.10.jpg [2.9 MB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewÇؼ®ÇÐ Âü°í¹®Çå  1 ¾È 2012.02.16 2095
35Simple viewÇؼ®ÇÐ ¼³¸í ¾È¸íÁØ 2010.04.27 3219
34Simple view ¼º¼­ Çؼ®À» ÅëÇÑ ¸ñȸÀÚÀÇ ¿µ¼º °³¹ß  ¾È¸íÁØ 2009.11.09 2910
33Simple view½Å¾à¼º°æ ÀúÀÚµéÀÇ Çؼ®ÀÇ ¿µ¼º/ Á¶µ¿È£ ¾È¸íÁØ 2009.11.09 2866
32Çؼ®»ç(2009-02º¸¿Ï).hwp [58 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view½ÅÇÐÀû Çؼ®ÇÐ °­ÀÇ Çؼ®»ç(º¸Ãæ) ¾È¸íÁØ 2009.09.28 2755
31Simple viewÇؼ®ÇÐ: À§Å°¹é°ú À§Å°¹é°ú 2009.09.07 2692
30»çº» - 4.7 ½ÅÇÐÀûÇؼ®Ç¥Áö¼öÁ¤.jpg [1.9 MB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view½ÅÇÐÀû Çؼ®ÇÐ ÇÏ/ ¾È¸íÁØ¿Ü ¾È¸íÁØ 2009.04.28 2766
292006426.jpg [82 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view½ÅÇÐÀûÇؼ®ÇÐß¾  /¾È¸íÁØ¿Ü ¾È¸íÁØ 2009.04.28 2562
28Ä®ºó ·Î¸¶¼­ ÁÖ¼® Àüü - Çѱ¹¾î[1].hwp [288 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewÄ®ºóÀÇ ·Î¸¶¼­ ÁÖ¼® Àüü Ä®ºó 2008.10.06 3365
27¾ÈÀú¼­Ä®ºóÀǼº°æÇؼ®ÇÐ1.hwp [87 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewÄ®ºóÀÇ ¼º°æÇؼ®ÇРå 1 ¾È¸íÁØ 2008.10.06 3364
26½ÅÇÐÀûÇؼ®ÇоȰ­ÀÇ.alz [86 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view½ÅÇÐÀûÇؼ®ÇÐ °­ÀÇ¾È ¾È¸íÁر³¼ö ¾È¸íÁØ 2008.09.07 2730
25ÇǾÇؼ®.pdf [897 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewÇǾÀǽÅÇÐÀûÇؼ®ÇÐ ¾È¸íÁØ ¾È¸íÁØ 2008.06.06 3497
24Simple view±³ºÎµé°ú ÇÔ²² ¼º°æ ÀÐ±â  ¾È¸íÁØ 2008.04.27 3792
23Simple view¸ñȸÀû »î ºú¾î³½ Çؼ®ÇÐ°è ´ë°¡ ¾Ø¼­´Ï Ƽ½½ÅÏ  ¾Ø¼­´Ï Ƽ... 2008.03.06 3380
22Ä®ºóÀDZ¸¾à¼º¼­ÁÖ¼®¿¡³ªÅ¸³­Çؼ®ÀÇ¿ø¸®¿Í¹æ¹ýõ»ç¹«¿¤.pdf [1 MB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewÄ®ºóÀDZ¸¾àÁÖ¼®¿¡³ªÅ¸³­Çؼ®¿ø¸®¿Í¹æ¹ýõ»ç¹«¿¤ Ãµ»ç¹«¿¤ 2008.02.19 3320
21Simple viewÄ®ºóÀÇ ¼º¼­ Çؼ®ÇÐ -±èº¸¹Î  ±èº¸¹Î 2008.01.29 3277
20¿þ½½¸®¿ÍÄ®ºóÇؼ®¿¬¼Ó¼ºÀ±Ã¶¿ø.hwp [48 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewÄ®ºó°ú ¿þ½½¸®ÀÇ ¼º¼­Çؼ®¹æ¹ý·Ð ¿¬¼Ó¼º/À±Ã¶¿ø À±Ã¶¿ø 2008.01.15 3119
19Simple view[¼º°æÀ¸·Î µ¹¾Æ°¡ÀÚ¡ª¼º°æ ´ëŽ±¸] ¼º¼­ºñÆòÇÐÀ̶õ... ¾È¸íÁØ 2008.01.08 2622
18Simple view¼º¼­Çؼ®ÇÐÀÚ·á ÇãÈ£Àͱ³¼ö ¾È¸íÁØ 2007.05.20 3814
17Ä®ºó°£°á¼º°ú¿ëÀ̼º³í¹®.pdf [3.5 MB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view¾È¸íÁر³¼öÀÇ ¹Ú»çÇÐÀ§ ³í¹® ÀϺκÐ: Ä®ºóÀǽÅÇÐÀû... ahn 2007.04.16 3897
16hertheology.pdf [114 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewhermeneutical theology/Oswal Bayer ¾È¸íÁØ 2007.03.26 3638
15Çؼ®»ç(2009-02).hwp [30 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view½ÅÇÐÀûÇؼ®Çа­ÀÇ 2°­/Çؼ®»ç ¾È¸íÁØ 2007.03.26 3503
14¼º¼­ Çؼ®ÀÇ ±â¿ø.hwp [90 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view¼º¼­Çؼ®ÇР¾È¸íÁØ 2007.03.19 3497
13bultmann.hml [62 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewºÒÆ®¸¸ÀÇ Çؼ®ÇÐ/¾È¸íÁØ ¾È¸íÁØ 2007.03.19 2744
12kbarth.hml [17 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewÄ® ¹Ù¸£Æ®ÀÇ Çؼ®ÇÐ/¾È¸íÁØ ¾È¸íÁØ 2007.03.19 2532
11½¶¶óÀÌ¿¡¸£¸¶ÇãÀÇ Çؼ®ÇÐ.hwp [28 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view½¶¶óÀÌ¿¡¸£¸¶ÇãÀÇ Çؼ®ÇÐ/¾È¸íÁØ ¾È¸íÁØ 2007.03.19 2433
10nhermeneutics.hml [21 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view½Å Çؼ®ÇÐ/¾È¸íÁØ ¾È¸íÁØ 2007.03.19 2494
9Simple viewÇؼ®ÇÐÀû½ÅÇÐ/½ÅÇÐÀû Çؼ®ÇÐ/¾È¸íÁØ ¾È¸íÁØ 2007.03.19 2812
8½ÅÇÐÀûÇؼ®[±¸°­ÀÇ].hwp [30 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view½ÅÇÐÀûÇؼ®Çа­ÀÇ/±¸°­ÀÇ/¾È¸íÁØ ¾È¸íÁØ 2007.03.19 2591
7Calvin¡¯s Hermeneutic and Tradition An Augustinian Reception of Romans 7.htm [221 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewCalvin¡¯s Hermeneutic and Tradition:  ·ÎÀ̵åÁ¸½º 2006.12.24 2560
6Calvin_and_His_Interpretative_Methody_by_Michael_Mewborn.pdf [29 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewCalvin_and_His_Interpretative_Methody_by_Michae... ¾È¸íÁØ 2006.12.24 2518
5¸á¶ûÈ÷ÅæÀǼö»çÇаú·Î¸¶¼­ÁÖ¼®1[ÀÌÀº¼±].hwp [42 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view¸á¶ûÈ÷ÅæÀÇ ¼ö»çÇаú ·Î¸¶¼­/ÀÌÀº¼±±³¼ö ÀÌÀº¼± 2006.07.07 3143
4Simple view±¸Á¶ÁÖÀÇ¿Í ±¸Á¶ÁÖÀÇÀû ¼º¼­Çؼ® - Àüö  °ü¸®ÀÚ 2002.05.01 4199
3Simple viewÇö»óÇаú Çؼ®ÇÐ-°¡´Ù¸Ó, ÇÏÀ̵¥°Å, Èʼ¿  °ü¸®ÀÚ 2002.05.01 3601
2Simple viewÇö´ëöÇп¡¼­ÀÇ Çؼ®ÇÐ- ºê¸®Å×´ÏÄ«  °ü¸®ÀÚ 2002.05.01 3400
1Simple view½ÅÇÐÀûÇؼ®Çа­ÀÇ/Á¾±³°³ÇõÀÚµéÀÇ ½ÅÇаú Çؼ®¹æ¹ý... °ü¸®ÀÚ 2002.05.01 3468
üũµÈ Ç׸ñ ÇѲ¨¹ø¿¡ »èÁ¦/º¹»ç/À̵¿ Çϱâ
üũµÈ Ç׸ñ »èÁ¦ üũµÈ Ç׸ñ »èÁ¦
üũµÈ Ç׸ñ À̵¿ üũµÈ Ç׸ñ À̵¿
üũµÈ Ç׸ñ º¹»ç üũµÈ Ç׸ñ º¹»ç
ÀÌÀüÆäÀÌÁö ÇöÀçÆäÀÌÁö°¡ ¸¶Áö¸·ÆäÀÌÁö ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌÀü 1  2 ´ÙÀ½
±Û³²±â±â »õ·Î°íħ
À̸§À» °Ë»öÇ׸ñ¿¡ Ãß°¡/Á¦°ÅÁ¦¸ñÀ» °Ë»öÇ׸ñ¿¡ Ãß°¡/Á¦°Å³»¿ëÀ» °Ë»öÇ׸ñ¿¡ Ãß°¡/Á¦°Å ¸ÞÀÎÈ­¸éÀ¸·Î µ¹¾Æ°¡±â