À̸§°Ë»ö
¸ÞÀϺ¸³»±â

À̸§°Ë»ö
¸ÞÀϺ¸³»±â

À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
¸ÞÀϺ¸³»±â

À̸§°Ë»ö
¸ÞÀϺ¸³»±â

À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
À̸§°Ë»ö
<!--TITLE_DATA-->
 
::: Çؼ®ÇÐ :::


96 12 Åë°èÄ«¿îÅÍ º¸±â   °ü¸®ÀÚ Á¢¼Ó --+
Name   ¾È¸íÁØ
Subject   Postmodern Hermeneutics
Postmodern Hermeneutics Ency of Standford

Hermeneutics, the science of textual interpretation, also plays a role in postmodern philosophy. Unlike deconstruction, which focuses upon the functional structures of a text, hermeneutics seeks to arrive at an agreement or consensus as to what the text means, or is about. Gianni Vattimo formulates a postmodern hermeneutics in The End of Modernity (1985, in English 1988 [1985]), where he distinguishes himself from his Parisian counterparts by posing the question of post-modernity as a matter for ontological hermeneutics. Instead of calling for experimentation with counter-strategies and functional structures, he sees the heterogeneity and diversity in our experience of the world as a hermeneutical problem to be solved by developing a sense continuity between the present and the past. This continuity is to be a unity of meaning rather than the repetition of a functional structure, and the meaning is ontological. In this respect, Vattimo's project is an extension of Heidegger's inquiries into the meaning of being. However, where Heidegger situates Nietzsche within the limits of metaphysics, Vattimo joins Heidegger's ontological hermeneutics with Nietzsche's attempt to think beyond nihilism and historicism with his concept of eternal return. The result, says Vattimo, is a certain distortion of Heidegger's reading of Nietzsche, allowing Heidegger and Nietzsche to be interpreted through one another (Vattimo 1988 [1985], 176). This is a significant point of difference between Vattimo and the French postmodernists, who read Nietzsche against Heidegger, and prefer Nietzsche's textual strategies over Heidegger's pursuit of the meaning of being.

On Vattimo's account, Nietzsche and Heidegger can be brought together under the common theme of overcoming. Where Nietzsche announces the overcoming of nihilism through the active nihilism of the eternal return, Heidegger proposes to overcome metaphysics through a non-metaphysical experience of being. In both cases, he argues, what is to be overcome is modernity, characterized by the image that philosophy and science are progressive developments in which thought and knowledge increasingly appropriate their own origins and foundations. Overcoming modernity, however, cannot mean progressing into a new historical phase. As Vattimo observes: ¡°Both philosophers find themselves obliged, on the one hand, to take up a critical distance from Western thought insofar as it is foundational; on the other hand, however, they find themselves unable to criticize Western thought in the name of another, and truer, foundation¡± (Vattimo 1988 [1985], 2). Overcoming modernity must therefore mean a Verwindung, in the sense of twisting or distorting modernity itself, rather than an Überwindung or progression beyond it.

While Vattimo takes post-modernity as a new turn in modernity, it entails the dissolution of the category of the new in the historical sense, which means the end of universal history. ¡°While the notion of historicity has become ever more problematic for theory,¡± he says, ¡°at the same time for historiography and its own methodological self-awareness the idea of history as a unitary process is rapidly dissolving¡± (Vattimo 1988 [1985], 6). This does not mean historical change ceases to occur, but that its unitary development is no longer conceivable, so only local histories are possible. The de-historicization of experience has been accelerated by technology, especially television, says Vattimo, so that ¡°everything tends to flatten out at the level of contemporaneity and simultaneity¡± (Vattimo 1988 [1985], 10). As a result, we no longer experience a strong sense of teleology in worldly events, but, instead, we are confronted with a manifold of differences and partial teleologies that can only be judged aesthetically. The truth of postmodern experience is therefore best realized in art and rhetoric.

The Nietzschean sense of overcoming modernity is ¡°to dissolve modernity through a radicalization of its own innate tendencies,¡± says Vattimo (Vattimo 1988 [1985], 166). These include the production of ¡°the new¡± as a value and the drive for critical overcoming in the sense of appropriating foundations and origins. In this respect, however, Nietzsche shows that modernity results in nihilism: all values, including ¡°truth¡± and ¡°the new,¡± collapse under critical appropriation. The way out of this collapse is the moment of eternal recurrence, when we affirm the necessity of error in the absence of foundations. Vattimo also finds this new attitude toward modernity in Heidegger's sense of overcoming metaphysics, insofar as he suggests that overcoming the enframing lies with the possibility of a turn within the enframing itself. Such a turn would mean deepening and distorting the technological essence, not destroying it or leaving it behind. Furthermore, this would be the meaning of being, understood as the history of interpretation (as ¡°weak¡± being) instead of a grounding truth, and the hermeneutics of being would be a distorted historicism. Unlike traditional hermeneutics, Vattimo argues that reconstructing the continuity of contemporary experience cannot be accomplished without unifying art and rhetoric with information from the sciences, and this requires philosophy ¡°to propose a ¡®rhetorically persuasive¡¯, unified view of the world, which includes in itself traces, residues, or isolated elements of scientific knowledge¡± (Vattimo 1988 [1985], 179). Vattimo's philosophy is therefore the project of a postmodern hermeneutics, in contrast to the Parisian thinkers who do not concern themselves with meaning or history as continuous unities.

°Ô½Ã¹°À» À̸ÞÀÏ·Î º¸³»±â ÇÁ¸°Æ®Ãâ·ÂÀ» À§ÇÑ È­¸éº¸±â
DATE: 2018.05.28 - 17:00

210.101.104.101 - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/66.0.3359.181 Safari/537.36


 ÀÌÀü±Û Àå¼¼ÈÆ, Æ÷½ºÆ®¸ð´ø ¼º°æÇؼ®ÇÐ µ¿Çâ
 ´ÙÀ½±Û °¡´Ù¸ÓÀÇ Áø¸®¿Í ¹æ¹ý ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³
±Û³²±â±â»èÁ¦Çϱâ¼öÁ¤Çϱâ´äº¯´Þ±âÀüü ¸ñ·Ï º¸±â

üũµÈ Ç׸ñ ÇѲ¨¹ø¿¡ º¸±â
96Simple view¾îÈÖÀǹ̷Ð(Lexical Semantics)°ú ¼º°æÇؼ® Á¦ÀÓ½º... À̾߱â 2023.06.06 211
95Simple viewINTERPRETING THE BIBLE: An Overview of Hermeneu... ¾È¸íÁØ 2019.04.11 1175
94Simple viewÀå¼¼ÈÆ, Æ÷½ºÆ®¸ð´ø ¼º°æÇؼ®ÇÐ µ¿Ç⠾ȸíÁØ 2018.05.28 1674
93ÇöÀç Àаí ÀÖ´Â ±ÛÀÔ´Ï´Ù.Postmodern Hermeneutics ¾È¸íÁØ 2018.05.28 1377
92°¡´Ù¸Ó Áø¸®¿Í ¹æ¹ý.pdf [2.2 MB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view°¡´Ù¸ÓÀÇ Áø¸®¿Í ¹æ¹ý ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ¾È¸íÁØ 2018.04.02 1572
91½Å Çؼ®ÇÐ 2018-1.hwp [98 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view½ÅÇؼ®Çаú Æ÷½ºÆ®¸ð´ø Çؼ®ÇР¾È¸íÁØ 2018.04.02 1443
90Simple view°¡´Ù¸Ó ÁöÆòÀÇ À¶ÇÕ ¾È¸íÁØ 2018.03.02 1501
89Simple viewÇؼ®ÇÐ ÀÚ·áµé ¸µÅ© ¾È¸íÁØ 2018.03.02 1284
88Simple view¿¡º§¸µ ½ÅÇаú ºñÆÇ ¾È¸íÁØ 2017.05.08 1306
87Simple viewOxford  hermeneutics ¾È¸íÁØ 2017.01.08 1956
86Simple viewhermeneutics, Jame Bohman ¾È¸íÁØ 2017.01.08 1407
85Simple view°³ÇõÁÖÀÇ ¼º°æÇؼ®ÇÐ ·Õ¸Ç ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.12.15 2896
84Simple view°¡´Ù¸ÓÀÇ ¡¸Áø¸®¿Í ¹æ¹ý¡¹  ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.11.21 1999
83L - 9 John.hwp [23 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewL 9  History of Her ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.05.19 1690
82L - 9 John Calvin.hwp [23 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewLecture 9 History of Hermeneutics ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.05.19 1503
81Lec 8 Her mj ahn.hwp [106 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewlecture 8  history of hermeneutics(korean file)... ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.04.28 1760
80Lec 8.doc [187 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewlecture 8  history of hermeneutics prof mj ahn ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.04.28 1589
79¾È¸íÁØ ÇǾ¹Ú»çÀÇ ¼º°æÇؼ®¹æ¹ý·Ð.hwp [61 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewÇǾÀÇ ¼º°æÇؼ®¹æ¹ý·Ð ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.04.25 1712
78L 7 History of Hermeneutics 4-14  - ÇѱÛ.hwp [216 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewL-7  Hermeneutics of Middle Age ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.04.14 1753
77L 7 History of Hermeneutics 4-14 .docx [209 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewL 7 4-14 Ambrose, Augustine..  Hisory of Her. ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.04.13 2226
76L 6 School of Antioch.hwp [333 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view¾Èµð¿Á ÇÐÆÄ Antioach Lecture 6 History of Herme... ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.04.07 1677
75L 6 School of Antioch.docx [295 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewAntioach Lecture 6 History of Hermeneutics mj a... ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.04.07 1485
74A History of Hermeneutics Lecture 5.docx [345 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewHistory of Hermeneutics Lecture 5 Prof. Myung J... ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.03.30 1329
73A History of Hermeneutics  Lecture 5.hwp [418 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewHermeneutics Lecture 5 Prof. Myung Jun Ahn ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.03.30 1362
72Her lectue 4 3-24 hwp.hwp [55 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewHistory of Hermeneutics  L 4  Prof. MJ Ahn ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.03.24 1307
71A History of Hermeneutics Lecture 4.docx [48 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewHistory of Her.  L 4  Prof. MJ Ahn ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.03.24 1327
70His Her Ahn Lecture 3-3-17  korean.hwp [128 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewHistory of Hermeneutics lecture L 3 Korean vers... ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.03.17 1331
69His Her Ahn Lecture 3-3-17 .docx [128 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewHistory of Hermeneutics lecture 3 ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.03.17 1361
68Lecture 2 Korepro.hwp [57 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewHistory of Hermeneutics lecture 2 K ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.03.10 1303
67Lecture 2 A History of Hermeneuticsby MJ Ahn.docx [74 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewlecture 2 history of hermeneutics prof mj ahn ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.03.10 1509
66Introduction of this course.docx [15 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewHistory of Hermeneutics  ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.03.03 1289
65Simple view¾Ø¼­´Ï Ƽ½½ÅÏ, ¡º±³¸®Çؼ®ÇС» ¾È¸íÁØ 2016.02.08 1511
64Simple view¼º°æÇؼ® ¼º°æ, ±× º»Áú¡¤¸ñÀû¡¤±ÇÀ§¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÏ°Ô ... ¾È¸íÁØ 2015.07.31 2313
63Simple view¼¼´ëÁÖÀÇ Çؼ®ÇР¾È¸íÁØ 2015.04.08 1989
62Simple view¿¡º§¸µ ¾ð¾î»ç°ÇÀÇ Çؼ®ÇР¾È¸íÁØ 2015.03.30 2062
61Simple viewÈıâ Çö´ëÁÖÀÇ Çؼ®ÇР¾È¸íÁØ 2015.03.29 1492
60Simple viewÇؼ®ÇÐ ¼­¿ï´ë öÇлç»ó¿¬±¸¼Ò ¾È¸íÁØ 2015.03.25 1511
59Simple viewwikipedia Hermeneutics ¾È¸íÁØ 2015.03.25 1478
58Simple viewÄܽºÅºÆ¾ À§Áõ¼­ ·Î·»Æ¼¿ì½º ¹ß¶ó ¾È¸íÁØ 2015.03.17 1789
57Simple view¿¡º§¸µÀÇ Çؼ®ÇÐÀû ½ÅÇÐÀ̶õ ¾È¸íÁØ 2015.03.10 1366
56Simple viewÀúÀÚ¿Í ÀúÀ۱ǿ¡ À¯³äÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ¾È¸íÁØ 2014.12.19 2054
55Simple view¹ÚÀ±¼± ¹Ú»çÀÇ °³Çõ½ÅÇÐ ÀçÆò°¡ ÀÌÀº¼± ¹Ú»ç ¾È¸íÁØ 2014.11.25 1731
54Simple viewopenpedia/Hermeneutics ¾È¸íÁØ 2014.06.13 861
53Simple view½ÅÇÐÀû Çؼ®ÇÐ ÀÚ·áµé À̽±¸ ¾È¸íÁØ 2014.02.04 1677
52½ÅÇлç»ó°ú ¼º°æÇؼ®¿¡ À־ ¿À¸®°Õ°ú Á¦·ÒÀÇ °ü°è°­´ëÈÆ.hwp [60 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view¿À¸®°Õ°ú Á¦·Ò ¾È¸íÁØ 2013.08.07 1531
51Simple view¼º°æÇؼ® ±è±¸¿ø±³¼ö ¾È¸íÁØ 2013.07.28 259
5019¼¼±â¿ÍÇö´ë½ÅÇÐÀÚÇؼ®.zip [103 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view19¼¼±â¿Í 20¼¼±â Çؼ® ¾È¸íÁØ 2012.04.16 764
492. Á¾±³°³ÇõÀÚµéÀÇ ½ÅÇаú Çؼ®¹æ¹ý(¾È°­ÀÇ).hwp [59 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple viewÁ¾±³°³ÇõÀÚµéÀÇ ½ÅÇаú Çؼ®¹æ¹ý(¾È°­ÀÇ) ¾È¸íÁØ 2012.04.16 1718
481. ½ÅÇÐÀûÇؼ®ÇоȸíÁØ°­ÀÇÇؼ®»ç¿ÍÁß¼¼.hwp [35 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view½ÅÇÐÀÇ¿ª»ç¿ÍÇؼ®°­ÀÇ/Áß¼¼¿ÍÇؼ® ¾È¸íÁØ 2012.03.26 1521
47½ÅÇаúÇؼ®ÇоȰ­ÀÇ.zip [355 KB] ´Ù¿î¹Þ±âSimple view2012 ½ÅÇÐÀÇ ¿ª»ç¿Í Çؼ® °­ÀÇ¾È  °ü¸®ÀÚ 2012.03.23 1470
üũµÈ Ç׸ñ ÇѲ¨¹ø¿¡ »èÁ¦/º¹»ç/À̵¿ Çϱâ
üũµÈ Ç׸ñ »èÁ¦ üũµÈ Ç׸ñ »èÁ¦
üũµÈ Ç׸ñ À̵¿ üũµÈ Ç׸ñ À̵¿
üũµÈ Ç׸ñ º¹»ç üũµÈ Ç׸ñ º¹»ç
ÇöÀçÆäÀÌÁö°¡ ùÆäÀÌÁö ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ´ÙÀ½ÆäÀÌÁö
ÀÌÀü 1  2 ´ÙÀ½
±Û³²±â±â »õ·Î°íħ
À̸§À» °Ë»öÇ׸ñ¿¡ Ãß°¡/Á¦°ÅÁ¦¸ñÀ» °Ë»öÇ׸ñ¿¡ Ãß°¡/Á¦°Å³»¿ëÀ» °Ë»öÇ׸ñ¿¡ Ãß°¡/Á¦°Å ¸ÞÀÎÈ­¸éÀ¸·Î µ¹¾Æ°¡±â